A surreal political cartoon showing a giant figure resembling the president sitting on the edge of the White House, dropping a pile of glitching computer parts, tangled wires, and tiny American flags onto a map of the United States below.
A surreal political cartoon showing a giant figure resembling the president sitting on the edge of the White House, dropping a pile of glitching computer parts, tangled wires, and tiny American flags onto a map of the United States below.

News Outlets Won't Describe the President's AI Video For What It Is: The President Pooping on America

In October 2025, President Donald Trump shared a controversial AI-generated video on his Truth Social platform that depicted him piloting a fighter jet labeled "KING TRUMP" while wearing a crown and dropping brown sludge onto protesters during the nationwide "No Kings" rallies. The video, set to Kenny Loggins' "Danger Zone," coincided with demonstrations that drew nearly seven million participants across all 50 states protesting what they perceived as Trump's authoritarian tendencies.

While news outlets have described the video using various euphemisms—calling it "brown sludge," "waste material," or simply "dropping material"—many critics argue the imagery is unmistakably scatological and represents a deliberate metaphor for Trump's view of his political opponents and the American people. The visual content shows the president literally defecating on citizens exercising their constitutional right to protest.

The mainstream media's reluctance to directly describe the video's content has sparked criticism from media watchdogs and commentators who argue that journalistic integrity requires calling things what they are. Instead of using straightforward language, major news organizations have employed sanitized terminology that obscures the video's crude nature and its symbolic meaning.

House Speaker Mike Johnson defended the video as "satire" and praised Trump as "probably the most effective person who's ever used social media." However, critics contend that characterizing fecal imagery directed at American citizens as mere political satire represents a dangerous normalization of degrading rhetoric from the nation's highest office.

The incident has raised significant questions about media responsibility in covering presidential communications, particularly when those communications involve crude or dehumanizing content. Some media analysts argue that by avoiding direct description of the video's content, news organizations are failing in their duty to accurately inform the public about the nature of presidential communications.

The controversy also highlights broader concerns about the use of AI-generated media in political discourse and the ethical boundaries of presidential communication. As artificial intelligence makes it easier to create and disseminate manipulated content, the incident raises questions about how media should cover such material when it comes from the nation's highest elected official.

While the White House has not officially commented on the specific imagery in the video, the administration's supporters have characterized criticism as political correctness run amok. Meanwhile, media organizations continue to grapple with how to report on presidential communications that push the boundaries of traditional political discourse while maintaining professional standards of journalism.

The prompt for this was: News Outlets Won't Describe the President’s AI Video For What It Is: The President Pooping on America

Visit BotAdmins for done for you business solutions.